Home
Review Tasks
Details about creating, using, and managing review tasks
Working in a Review Task
Reviewing Content
As reviewers in a review task, Subject-Matter Experts can open shared documents, read them in context, and evaluate the content before adding feedback.

Introduction
Introduction to the Oxygen Content Fusion collaboration platform
Getting Started
Information to help you get started with Oxygen Content Fusion.
Working as a Subject-Matter Expert
Users with the Subject-Matter Expert platform user role use Oxygen Content Fusion to review shared content, add feedback, and suggest changes in a review task. They can also create and own review tasks.
Working as an Author
Authors use Oxygen Content Fusion to manage projects, edit content, run reviews, publish deliverables, and work with AI-assisted features.
Projects and Publishing
Information about using and managing Content Fusion projects
Review Tasks
Details about creating, using, and managing review tasks
- Types of Review Tasks
  Oxygen Content Fusion supports two types of review tasks: Project Review Tasks and Independent Review Tasks.
- Review Task Status
  Details about how the review task status appears to task owners and reviewers for projects and independent review tasks.
- My Review Tasks Page
  How to use the My Review Tasks page to find, filter, and open review tasks.
- Creating and Setting Up Review Tasks
- Working in a Review Task
  - Reviewing Content
    As reviewers in a review task, Subject-Matter Experts can open shared documents, read them in context, and evaluate the content before adding feedback.
  - Review Task Header
    Use the review task header to view task details, check status, and access actions such as sharing, viewing owners, and requesting re-review.
  - Review Task Dashboard
    The review task dashboard is the starting place for working with a review task, showing details about the task and providing access to actions for working with task files.
  - Files View
    Use the Files view in a review task to open the task files, see who is working in them, upload or create new files, and download the task content.
  - Reviewing and Editing Files in the Visual Editor
    Details about the functionality of the visual editor that is used in Content Fusion to display and edit review task files, suggest changes, and add comments.
  - Task Activity View
    Use the Task Activity view to review task-level messages, track file changes, and open earlier or current file versions.
  - Search View
    Use the Search view in a review task to find text across all review task files and filter the results.
  - Reviews View
    Use the Reviews view in a review task to search and filter comments and other review items across task files.
  - AI Positron View
    Use the AI Positron view in a review task to get AI-generated suggestions and content while you work.
- Completing and Managing Review Tasks
Server Administrator Guide
Information for server administrators about deploying and configuring an Enterprise server
Technical Issues
Information about error messages and known issues for Content Fusion
Web Author vs. Content Fusion
A comparison between Oxygen XML Web Author and Oxygen Content Fusion
Copyright
Legal information

Reviewing Content

As reviewers in a review task, Subject-Matter Experts can open shared documents, read them in context, and evaluate the content before adding feedback.

When you open a review task as a reviewer, you can read the shared content in the online editor. This helps you review the text in a structured environment instead of working with static files or email attachments.

Before you add feedback, it is often useful to read through the content first and understand its purpose, structure, and audience.

Typical Review Actions

Open the files included in the task.
Read the content in order or move directly to the sections that need attention.
Check wording, structure, accuracy, and completeness.
Look for issues that affect the intended audience.

Good Review Practices

Focus on clear, specific feedback. If you find a problem, explain what is wrong and, if possible, suggest a better wording or a concrete correction. This helps authors process the feedback faster.