[oXygen-user] no luck with xproc scenario

[George Cristian Bina]

Hi Christian,

There is no support for using variables for the input bindings, sorry 
about the documentation/feature missmatch. We already fixed this in the 
current development adding support for editor variables when you specify 
the input bindings.
Actually the XProc scenarios support will be improved in oXygen 11.1 as 
we already added support for specifying parameters and options.

The ${cfn} stands for current file name and it is computed depending on 
whatever the current file is. If the selected editor is an XProc file 
then that will contain that file name. Please note that one of the 
interesting improvements in version 11 was that any type of scenario can 
be set for any file so you can set an XProc scenario for an XML file and 
then if you execute the transformation with that file as the current 
file then the ${cfn} variable will be expanded to that file filename.

Best Regards,
George
-- 
George Cristian Bina
<oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger
http://www.oxygenxml.com

Christian Wittern wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> Today I got my first XProc file working and now I am struggling to drive it
> from oxygen.  What I would like to achieve is that the input and output
> files are taken from the environment in a similar way as the XSLT scenario
> does.  However, the input port dialog does not let me input editor
> variables, although the help seems to suggest that this should be possible.
> And on the output side, I can set an editor variable, but if I set it to
> contain ${cfn} as I usually do, this turns out to be the filename of the
> XPRoc file, not of the input file, so it is the same for all files and thus
> not useful.  Either I am seriously misunderstanding how this is supposed to
> work, or there are some bugs to fix here.
> 
> Cheers,  Christian
> 
> 
>