Down-converting from Relax to DTD
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2004 8:27 pm
The &= construction, used heavily in the O'Reilly book, is not supported by trang when down-converting from a Relax Schema to a DTD. This construct is very useful when constructing very large DTDs from modules.
Are there plans to enhance trang and/or to support down-conversion supporting this syntactic feature of Relax?
Are there plans to enhance trang and/or to support down-conversion supporting this syntactic feature of Relax?