Page 1 of 1

No related links output in PDF

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 11:07 am
by chrizzbee
Good day!

I am a little confused. In Oxy 17, when I publish a map which contains reltable information, the related links do not appear in PDF. Not even collection-type = family creates any links. If I publish to webhelp or other web format, it works all nice. What do I do wrong here?

Here's my map:

Code: Select all

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE map PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DITA Map//EN" "map.dtd">
<map>
<title>DITA Topic Map</title>
<topicref href="c_xplmpubl_aboutthismanual.xml" collection-type="family">
<topicref href="c_xplmpubl_targetaudience.xml"/>
<topicref href="c_xplmpubl_revisions.xml"/>
</topicref>
<topicref href="task.xml"/>
<reltable>
<relheader>
<relcolspec/>
<relcolspec/>
</relheader>
<relrow>
<relcell>
<topicref href="c_xplmpubl_targetaudience.xml"/>
</relcell>
<relcell>
<topicref href="task.xml"/>
</relcell>
</relrow>
</reltable>
</map>
Thanks for advice
Chris.

Re: No related links output in PDF

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 1:01 pm
by chrizzbee
"args.rellinks = all" did the trick.

Re: No related links output in PDF

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 2:14 pm
by alex_jitianu
Hi Chris,

I'm glad you got to the bottom of the problem.

Best regards,
Alex

Re: No related links output in PDF

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2015 12:09 pm
by chrizzbee
I find it a bit strange that I must set for PDF output "args_rellinks" specifically to show related link information. Whereas for web publications, it seems to be enabled by default, as soon as I set either collection-type = family on a parent or I insert a relationship table.

What puzzles me further is the fact that for web publications the label says "Related information" and in PDF it says "Related links".

OK, I refer to OT 1.8.5 here - maybe they harmonized something in OT 2.0, dunno.

Re: No related links output in PDF

Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2015 10:46 am
by alex_jitianu
Hi Chris,

The different behavior comes from the different XSLs being applied for each publishing output. In OT 2.0 the transformations might be more consistent, but I haven't tried it. If you want to find out if this different behavior has intended or just something that slipped, maybe someone from the DITA users group might know more.

Best regards,
Alex