[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Is this correct: " A sequence of more than one item is not allowed as the first argument of dynamic function call "
Subject: Re: [xsl] Is this correct: " A sequence of more than one item is not allowed as the first argument of dynamic function call " From: "Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:27:49 -0000 |
You declared $g to expect a single item as its argument, but in the call $g($x), $x is bound to a sequence of more than one item. Even though $g is bound to a function (reverse#1) that accepts multiple items, I think the function coercion rules expect the call to satisfy the declared type. Michael Kay Saxonica mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx +44 (0118) 946 5893 On 15 Jun 2014, at 00:45, Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have this transformation: > > <xsl:stylesheet version="3.0" > xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"> > <xsl:template match="/"> > <xsl:sequence select= > "function($f as function(item()*) as item(), > $g as function(item()) as item()*, > $x as item()* > ) as item()* > { $f($g($x)) } > (head#1, reverse#1, ('H','e','l','l','o')) > "/> > </xsl:template> > </xsl:stylesheet> > > When I use BaseX to evaluate the XPath 3.0 expression that is > specified in the "select" attribute of the <xsl:sequence> above, I get > the expected, correct result: > > "o". > > However, when I run this transformation with the Saxon-EE 9.5.1.3 from > within Oxygen, I get this error: > > Severity: fatal > Description: XPTY0004: A sequence of more than one item is not allowed > as the first argument of dynamic function call ("H", "e", ...) > URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/#ERRXPTY0004 > > I have never heard of any such limitation before, haven't seen such a > rule in any specification and cannot find any reasons for such > limitation. > > Could someone, please, explain if this behavior is a bug, or not? If > this is correct behavior, what is the rationale behind this > limitation? > > > -- > Cheers, > Dimitre Novatchev > --------------------------------------- > Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. > --------------------------------------- > To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk > ------------------------------------- > Never fight an inanimate object > ------------------------------------- > To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the > biggest mistake of all > ------------------------------------ > Quality means doing it right when no one is looking. > ------------------------------------- > You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what > you're doing is work or play > ------------------------------------- > To achieve the impossible dream, try going to sleep. > ------------------------------------- > Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. > ------------------------------------- > Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they > write all patents, too? :) > ------------------------------------- > I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Is this correct: " A sequ, Dimitre Novatchev dn | Thread | Re: [xsl] Is this correct: " A sequ, Dimitre Novatchev dn |
Re: [xsl] Schema-awareness and buil, Michael Kay mike@xxx | Date | Re: [xsl] Is this correct: " A sequ, Dimitre Novatchev dn |
Month |