[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] What is the "closure" of a function?


Subject: Re: [xsl] What is the "closure" of a function?
From: "Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 14:03:35 -0000

Thank you Abel,

I hope this could be fixed in the 3.1 documents.

On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:39 AM, Abel Braaksma (Exselt) abel@xxxxxxxxxx
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 23-5-2014 22:28, Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>  The Functions and Operators 3.0 recommendation
>> (http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions-30/) uses the term "closure" of
>> a function:
>>
>> "In effect, the static and dynamic part of the context thus act as
>> part of the closure of the function item."
>>
>> However, there is no formal definition of "closure".
>>
>> A search for "closure " in the Data-Model 3.0" Recommendation yields 0 results.
>
> It appears to me that at some point the term "closure" was dropped. In
> the public 06/2011 version of the XDM, a definition existed:
>
> "[Definition: The combination of the variable values needed to execute a
> function and the function implementation are called a closure.]" (see
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-xpath-datamodel-30-20110614/#function-items)
>
> But in the following draft, 12/2011, this was dropped/revised.
>
> It looks like the term closure was not fully removed in related documents.
>
>> However, the XDM defines the so called "nonlocal variable bindings":
>>
>> "nonlocal variable bindings (a mapping from xs:QName to item()*): This
>> provides a value for each of the function's free variables (i.e.,
>> variables referenced by the function's implementation, other than
>> locals and parameters)."
>>
>> My question is:
>>
>>   Is it safe to assume that what is referred to as the "closure"
>> property of functions in the F & O document is the same as the
>> "nonlocal variable bindings" property of functions, defined in the
>> XDM?
>
> Yes, I think that is a safe assumption.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Abel Braaksma
> Exselt XSLT 3.0 streaming processor
> http://exselt.net
> 



-- 
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the
biggest mistake of all
------------------------------------
Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
-------------------------------------
To achieve the impossible dream, try going to sleep.
-------------------------------------
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
-------------------------------------
Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they
write all patents, too? :)
-------------------------------------
I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.


Current Thread
Keywords