[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] RM: RFC: Instrinsically-defined maps?
|
Subject: Re: [xsl] RM: RFC: Instrinsically-defined maps? From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:06:53 +0100 |
> It would be nice to be able to have the features of all 3 in a single > type.... in other words a memo-function whose stored keys you could > retrieve. Doesn't this make the result dependent on order of execution? Given the expression f(1), f(2), keys(f#1), f(3), f(4) are you expecting that keys(f#1) will return (1,2)? If so, that's certainly non-deterministic. Michael Kay Saxonica
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] RM: RFC: Instrinsically-d, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] RM: RFC: Instrinsically-d, David Rudel |
| Re: [xsl] RM: RFC: Instrinsically-d, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] RM: RFC: Instrinsically-d, David Rudel |
| Month |