Subject: Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree? From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:39:24 +0000 
In explaining why count(//x) is streamable whereas data(//x) is not, David Carlisle wrote: count() just returns a single value and the system could conceptually go through the document once counting every time it sees x. data(//x) is the same as //x/data(.) and returns the data of each element in the sequence. Now the first element in the sequence is the outer x. To work out its data the system has to process the _full_ content of that element (which actually is the whole document). Then the next element of the sequence is the inner x. Oops, we passed that already, so you need to back up to get that. This is why the concern about "overlapping trees" comes from. Thanks David, that is an outstanding explanation. Question: So, what is the general principle at work here? I'll take a stab at answering that question: Let's take as reference this XML: <Document> <x> <x>A</x> B </x> </Document> Consider an XPath expression that yields a sequence of <x> elements. Now consider an operation on that sequence. Is the operation on the sequence streamable or not? For example, is the operation count() on the sequence generated by the XPath expression //x streamable or not? Is the operation data() on the sequence generated by //x streamable or not? We must consider two cases: Case 1: One or more items in the sequence has has an <x> element nested inside another <x>. If the operation can be performed just by inspecting each item of the sequence, then the operation on the sequence is streamable. If the operation requires going inside each item of the sequence, then the operation on the sequence is not streamable. Case 2: There are no items in the sequence that have an <x> element nested inside another <x>. (Each item in the sequence is disjoint) The operation on the sequence is streamable, regardless of whether the operation just inspects each item or goes inside each item. Is that correct? Is it complete? Are there any cases that it misses? Can you express it more simply and more clearly? /Roger
Current Thread 


< Previous  Index  Next > 

Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, Imsieke, Gerrit, le  Thread  Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, David Carlisle 
Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, Michael Sokolov  Date  Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, David Carlisle 
Month 
This website was created & generated with <oXygen/>^{®}XML Editor