[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Does
On 03/09/2012 17:12, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
Why?
Why copy the whole thing rather than just apply templates and follow references as you go?
David
google plus: https:/profiles.google.com/d.p.carlisle
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Re: [xsl] Does use a lot of memory? Is there an alternative that is more efficient?
Subject: Re: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot of memory? Is there an alternative that is more efficient? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 17:15:08 +0200 |
On 03/09/2012 17:12, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
However, the element that I just inlined may have a reference. So I store the results into a variable and then repeat the process on the content of the variable.
Why?
Why copy the whole thing rather than just apply templates and follow references as you go?
I don't see why you need any local storage or variables at all. --
David
google plus: https:/profiles.google.com/d.p.carlisle
________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot, Costello, Roger L. | Thread | RE: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot, Costello, Roger L. |
RE: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot, Costello, Roger L. | Date | Re: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot, Graydon |
Month |