[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] how with xPath 1
|
Subject: Re: [xsl] how with xPath 1 From: Leo Studer <leo.studer@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 18:39:55 +0200 |
Thank you Michael this makes complete sense. Indeed my question is a first order problem. Always Leo > On 15.04.2012, at 18:34, Michael Kay wrote: > > XPath 1.0 is not "relationally complete", that is, there are queries expressible in first-order predicate calculus that are not expressible in XPath 1.0. This might well be one of them. In such cases you need some assistance from the host language (e.g. XSLT or Java). > > Michael Kay > Saxonica
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] how with xPath 1, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] how with xPath 1, Liam R E Quin |
| Re: [xsl] how with xPath 1, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] how with xPath 1, Liam R E Quin |
| Month |