[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
On 02/09/2012 02:16 PM, Michael Kay wrote:
XSLT 2.0 is not that difficult compared to kernel scheduler (ref to anesthesiologist)
what is missing is the community...
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors
Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors From: Andriy Gerasika <andriy.gerasika@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:37:50 +0200 |
On 02/09/2012 02:16 PM, Michael Kay wrote:
Sadly, not yet (except via the Java bridge). No recent news from the LIBX* project: http://www.explain.com.au/libx/. Perhaps Steve Ball found
my half-year old experiment w/ enhancing libxml2: https://github.com/andriy-gerasika/libxml2/commits/master
something else to do with his weekends. I think the days of hobbyist implementations of these technologies are past.
XSLT 2.0 is not that difficult compared to kernel scheduler (ref to anesthesiologist)
what is missing is the community...
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors, Andriy Gerasika | Thread | [xsl] [Ann] floodit.xsl (XSLT 2.0 i, Imsieke, Gerrit, le- |
Re: [xsl] Template matching on tunn, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] passing param using value, Wendell Piez |
Month |