[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
On 13/02/2012 12:00, Geert Josten wrote:
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors
|
Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:51:57 +0000 |
On 13/02/2012 12:00, Geert Josten wrote:
Yes, there's lots of people both individuals and corporate who enjoy doing exciting things that are new. The number of people prepared to stick at it and do version 2 of anything is much smaller, and they tend to ask questions about whether it will make any money.Quite funny to read this lengthy thread *after* XMLPrague, at which people spoke about using XSLT 1.0 to convert XQuery into JavaScript (to allow XQuery support in XSLTForms), implement template ruling into XQuery using higher-order functions, using the already mentioned Carrot that in theorie can be translated to both XSLT and XQuery (probably could be implemented in both as well), JSON integration into XQuery and XForms. Heck there was even a Demojam of someone who wrote an XSLT 2.0 processor in JavaScript..
Michael Kay Saxonica
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors, Geert Josten | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors, Tony Graham |
| Re: [xsl] Grouping by distinct comb, Simon Pepping | Date | RE: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors, Tony Graham |
| Month |