[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] Rule of thumb: Are XPath 2.0 or XSLT 2.0 constructs faster?

Subject: Re: [xsl] Rule of thumb: Are XPath 2.0 or XSLT 2.0 constructs faster?
From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 06:02:53 -0800

> Interesting.  How exactly does that work?

The best answer is: Try it.

The "current statement" marker moves from one subexpression to another
when stepping through.


On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:53 AM, TW <zupftom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2012/2/9 Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>> I like pure XPath solutions because they are less verbose, but I find
>>> "full" XSLT less restricting and easier to debug (especially when I
>>> want to check what variable holds what value).
>> Since about 6 months oXygen has implemented stepping through an XPath
>> expression (not sure about setting breakpoints). Thus there should be
>> no difference in debugging XPath code and XSLT code with oXygen.
> Interesting. B How exactly does that work?
> Thomas W.

Dimitre Novatchev
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
Never fight an inanimate object
To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the
biggest mistake of all
Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.

Current Thread