[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] Can this hard-coded template be generalized?


Subject: Re: [xsl] Can this hard-coded template be generalized?
From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 18:02:06 -0400

At 2011-10-02 14:47 -0700, Mark wrote:
My problem was that I was unable to say
abstractly exactly what I wanted to do and
resorted to the hard code example to picture
what was needed. The source of that problem is
that I cannot always picture accurately what is
being presented at some specific processing instance and place.

Not at all uncommon.


Oddly enough, because of that problem, although
I had started with a close approximation of your
code, I made some wrong initial assumptions
about what I had in hand, followed by several
mistaken corrections, which led to all that noise.

Not a problem. That happens when you get off on a tangent.


I have, however, simplified a lot of code after
we talked last week, but there are still many
C++ fingerprints smeared on it. At 72, it is
just a bit harder to change one's tricks.

No doubt such thinking will keep your mind sharp! I'm a second-generation freelance computer programmer myself and taught these technologies to my father in one of my public classes (never was I more nervous as a teacher!).

In posting to this list I try to illustrate
different techniques used in solutions.

Thatbs why yesterday I asked the list for sources of XSLT design patterns.

I sell a book on XSLT (and one on XSL-FO, and one on UBL, and one on code lists in XML), but I'm too biased to give you a proper recommendation. It is more a reference than a book of design patterns. My instructor-led hands-on teaching and our 24-hour interactive instructional DVD are both based on this book.

Next week I'll be announcing to this list the
book's recent unlocked availability in its
complete form on a "try and buy" promise (if you
like it, you buy it; if you don't, you delete
it).  Too busy this week to announce it properly.

No sources, but got a misdirected affectionate note in French, though.

I smiled on reading it, then smiled wider recognizing who wrote it.


Good luck, Mark!

. . . . . . . . . . . . Ken


-- Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal


Current Thread
Keywords