[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
From the description of the problem, I think he wanted @filter='filter1' rather than contains(@filter, 'filter1'). It's a common mistake, people think of a node as "containing" a value and so reach for the contains() function without reading the spec to see what it does.
Re: [xsl] Thought i knew this but i guess not
Subject: Re: [xsl] Thought i knew this but i guess not From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:10:19 +0000 |
Finally, I note that your test for your filter is brittle. @filter='filter11' will pass. (And 'filter10' will pass for two reasons.) The best fix to this depends on how you are using @filter.
From the description of the problem, I think he wanted @filter='filter1' rather than contains(@filter, 'filter1'). It's a common mistake, people think of a node as "containing" a value and so reach for the contains() function without reading the spec to see what it does.
Michael Kay Saxonica
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Thought i knew this but i, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: Re: [xsl] Thought i knew this b, russurquhart1 |
Re: [xsl] Cheaper to prepend or app, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Cheaper to prepend or app, Liam R E Quin |
Month |