[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Is it legal to do
The XSLT 1.0 specification is often admired for its brevity, but it does leave many things unsaid. The 2.0 specs are often considered long-winded in comparison, but they do tend to cover the ground more comprehensively. In 2.0 you will find the rules here:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#constructing-complex-content
In particular rule 9.
One of the changes in the 2.0 spec is that it tries hard to avoid temporal language, for example any suggestion that if you have two xsl:attribute instructions then they are executed in a particular order.
Re: [xsl] Is it legal to do ?
Subject: Re: [xsl] Is it legal to do <xsl:copy-of select="element/@attribute"/>? From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 09:43:40 +0000 |
I guess that the wise people who authored the spec didn't want to be redundant
The XSLT 1.0 specification is often admired for its brevity, but it does leave many things unsaid. The 2.0 specs are often considered long-winded in comparison, but they do tend to cover the ground more comprehensively. In 2.0 you will find the rules here:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#constructing-complex-content
In particular rule 9.
One of the changes in the 2.0 spec is that it tries hard to avoid temporal language, for example any suggestion that if you have two xsl:attribute instructions then they are executed in a particular order.
Michael Kay Saxonica
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Is it legal to do <xsl:co, TW | Thread | [xsl] generating conditional commen, Trevor Nicholls |
Re: [xsl] Is it legal to do <xsl:co, TW | Date | Re: [xsl] Nested list, from flat to, Kjellaug Johansen |
Month |
Keywords