[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Sometimes of course this means repeating work. Sometimes the optimizer can eliminate the repeated work for you; sometimes you can eliminate it yourself by using variables to hold the intermediate results of a computation. Taken further, this leads to pipeline architecture in which you put your data through a series of transformation steps composed in series or in parallel.
Re: [xsl] Need StringBuffer equivalent in xslt
Subject: Re: [xsl] Need StringBuffer equivalent in xslt From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:05:17 +0100 |
If you want two separate results you simply process the input twice.
Sometimes of course this means repeating work. Sometimes the optimizer can eliminate the repeated work for you; sometimes you can eliminate it yourself by using variables to hold the intermediate results of a computation. Taken further, this leads to pipeline architecture in which you put your data through a series of transformation steps composed in series or in parallel.
Michael Kay Saxonica
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Need StringBuffer equival, Michael Müller-Hille | Thread | [xsl] Serializing document fragment, Heiko Niemann |
Re: [xsl] Need StringBuffer equival, Michael Müller-Hille | Date | [xsl] Serializing document fragment, Heiko Niemann |
Month |