[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[xsl] [XPath 1.0] Why is .[A] illegal but self::node()[A] is legal?
|
Subject: [xsl] [XPath 1.0] Why is .[A] illegal but self::node()[A] is legal? From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 11:17:10 -0400 |
Hi Folks, Why is this XPath 1.0 expression illegal: .[A] whereas this XPath 1.0 expression is legal: self::node()[A] Isn't '.' a shorthand for 'self::node()'? Shouldn't I be able to interchange the two in any expression? /Roger
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Katakana substitution reg, Wolfgang Laun | Thread | Re: [xsl] [XPath 1.0] Why is .[A] i, Wolfgang Laun |
| Re: [xsl] Katakana substitution reg, Wolfgang Laun | Date | Re: [xsl] [XPath 1.0] Why is .[A] i, Wolfgang Laun |
| Month |
Keywords