[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] First public working draft of XSLT 2.1
Subject: RE: [xsl] First public working draft of XSLT 2.1 From: "Vladimir Nesterovsky" <vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 01:07:17 -0700 |
> I think, that the new xsl:evaluate instruction is the most harmful addition .. > the worst effect will be from developers who > will widely practice the "easiest" way to achieve desired > effect with dynamic xpath. >> Of course there is a risk that some users will misuse the feature, >> but I don't think that's a very good argument for not making it available. Contrary, I think that a high risk of misuse is an important argument weighing the value of a feature. This way, for example, the last generation of programmig languages do not include pointers or restricts them (even C++x will ban some use of pointers) preventing their invalid, unsafe, unsecure use. -- Vladimir Nesterovsky http://www.nesterovsky-bros.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Re: First public working , Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] First public working draf, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Re: Dynamic number of sor, Fabre Lambeau | Date | Re: [xsl] .NET 4.0 XslCompiledTrans, Martin Honnen |
Month |