[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

RE: [xsl] Is xsl:for-each "syntactic sugar"?

Subject: RE: [xsl] Is xsl:for-each "syntactic sugar"?
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 15:29:53 +0100

> Not "many", all uses of for-each can be equivalently handled 
> by apply-templates.
> 

Only if the select expression selects nodes (rather than atomic values). But
XSLT 2.1 will remove this remaining difference.

Regards,

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] Is xsl:for-each "syntactic sugar"?, (continued) David Carlisle - 7 May 2010 12:47:09 -0000 Florent Georges - 7 May 2010 13:17:50 -0000 David Carlisle - 7 May 2010 13:32:14 -0000 Mukul Gandhi - 7 May 2010 13:28:20 -0000 Michael Kay - 7 May 2010 14:30:19 -0000 <= David Carlisle - 7 May 2010 14:34:08 -0000 Dimitre Novatchev - 7 May 2010 15:51:56 -0000 Dimitre Novatchev - 7 May 2010 01:50:35 -0000 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen - 7 May 2010 17:56:31 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] Is xsl:for-each "syntactic sugar"?, (continued)
- Dimitre Novatchev - 7 May 2010 01:50:35 -0000
  - C. M. Sperberg-McQueen - 7 May 2010 17:56:31 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Is xsl:for-each "syntacti, Mukul Gandhi	Thread	Re: [xsl] Is xsl:for-each "syntacti, David Carlisle
RE: Re: [xsl] Need help with functi, cknell	Date	Re: [xsl] Is xsl:for-each "syntacti, David Carlisle
	Month

Keywords

xslt

RE: [xsl] Is xsl:for-each "syntactic sugar"?

Products

Features

Shop

Resources

Support

Company