[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Hi David,
I understand. But I was really just reacting to the phrase "not required" in the original question, assuming that "not required" meant: not required, but allowed. Of course, I can't know without seeing the real DTD.
Re: [xsl] Ignore closing tag
Subject: Re: [xsl] Ignore closing tag From: Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:48:53 +0100 |
Hi David,
Abel
If it isn't required, but it isn't hurting either, and when it is used for machine-reading (as opposed to human-reading), then why bother trying to write "<elem>data" instead of "<elem>data</elem>"?
With the default sgml declaration, a closing tag for an element declared
empty would be an error, as for example <img></img> is an error in
HTML.
I understand. But I was really just reacting to the phrase "not required" in the original question, assuming that "not required" meant: not required, but allowed. Of course, I can't know without seeing the real DTD.
Regards, Abel
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Ignore closing tag, David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] Transform from UTF-8 symbol t, Selvaganesh |
Re: [xsl] xsl:copy-of issue, Imsieke, Gerrit, le- | Date | [xsl] What are the best XSLT 1 or X, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |