[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] Required cardinality checks
Subject: RE: [xsl] Required cardinality checks From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 07:22:52 +0100 |
> This makes sense, but there are some less obvious cases where > it is still not clear how the above would apply. Indeed. As I say, there has been a great deal of debate about exactly what is and is not allowed under these rules. The specification for error handling in the face of optimization is informal and leaves a lot to the good sense of implementors. Don't expect all implementations to behave the same way. Regards, Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Create a web interface to, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] Escaping Curly Braces in Rege, rowan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Re: [xsl] Create a web interface to, Michael Schäfer | Date | Re: [xsl] Create a web interface to, Vyacheslav Sedov |
Month |