[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
At 03:24 AM 1/7/2009, Scott Trenda wrote:
Yes!!! This one is better option to use PIs rather than CDATA. Thanks you all for having better discussion specially David and Michael who compel me to say the truth as I was happy to sit keep quite.
Thanks once again!!!
...JSR
RE: [xsl] CDATA Handling
Subject: RE: [xsl] CDATA Handling From: "J. S. Rawat" <jrawat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:22:47 +0530 |
At 03:24 AM 1/7/2009, Scott Trenda wrote:
<x>See following image: <?image base64="R0lGODlhDQANAMQ0IAOw==" ?></x>
Yes!!! This one is better option to use PIs rather than CDATA. Thanks you all for having better discussion specially David and Michael who compel me to say the truth as I was happy to sit keep quite.
Thanks once again!!!
...JSR
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] CDATA Handling, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] CDATA Handling, Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] XSLT, Web applications, a, Robert Koberg | Date | [xsl] Implicit casting from double , Mukul Gandhi |
Month |