[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] CDATA Handling
Subject: RE: [xsl] CDATA Handling From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:51:09 -0000 |
Base64 encoding does not use any characters that are special characters in XML, therefore enclosing it in CDATA is completely pointless. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: J. S. Rawat [mailto:jrawat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 06 January 2009 10:45 > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [xsl] CDATA Handling > > At 03:49 PM 1/6/2009, Michael Kay wrote: > >I guess the definition of professionalism is that if you're a > >professional, you advise the client when he gets the requirements > >wrong, and if you're not, you build whatever rubbish he asks for. > Basically client wants xml from HTML input and we provide > them xml along with image files. He asks us to embed the > images inside the xml instead of sending the images files > separately and they prefer to use base 64 representation for > the same. We have a generalize xml application where we put > image as <img.embed>base 64 representation of the > image</img.embed> in the form of tag. Now we need to > transform this tag (img.embed) into <![CDATA[base 64 > representation of the image]]>. They have their own > application where they use php to generate the image once again. > > Thanks > ...JSR
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] CDATA Handling, J. S. Rawat | Thread | RE: [xsl] CDATA Handling, J. S. Rawat |
RE: [xsl] CDATA Handling, J. S. Rawat | Date | RE: [xsl] CDATA Handling, J. S. Rawat |
Month |
Keywords