[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

---

---

I agree, that not having bindings for languages like Java would
achieve higher levels of portability.

I also read Appendix C of the XSLT 1.1 WD. It's pretty complex than
what I thought.

I am sorry for putting up an useless argument, and I withdraw my point.

On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It's a lot more than three pages. See Appendix C of
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt11/
>
> And after the controversy in 2001, I don't think the WG will want to get its
> fingers burnt again.
>
> Take a look at some of the correspondence, for example
>
> http://xsl.markmail.org/search/?q=Java%20language%20bindings%20petition


-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi

---