[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
At 07:10 PM 5/30/2008, David wrote:
Even without being terribly tricky, one might refactor and extend as
As David says, moving the position()=1 test accounts for the case of a set with one member. Adding a test inside the position()=last() clause accounts for the case of two members, which presumably shouldn't get a comma between them.
The problem of transposing from singular to plural forms reliably in English requires either NLP or at least a lookup table with all your possible terms; it's usually best dealt with by writing around it.
E.g., not "router, tranformers, and chassis" but "routers (1), transformers (4), and chassis (3)". It's not elegant, but it's clear enough and not obviously wrong either.
Re: [xsl] starts-with on more than one item
Subject: Re: [xsl] starts-with on more than one item From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:49:41 -0400 |
At 07:10 PM 5/30/2008, David wrote:
glad you got it working, just one comment,
<xsl:choose> <xsl:when test="position()=last()"> <xsl:value-of select="concat(', and ', ., '.')"/> </xsl:when> <xsl:when test="position()=1"> <xsl:value-of select="concat(' ', .)"/> </xsl:when> <xsl:otherwise> <xsl:value-of select="concat(', ', .)"/> </xsl:otherwise> </xsl:choose>
swap the first two when clauses, otherwise you'll get an ", and" on a list of length 1.
If it wasn't for the and you could replace the whole for-each by
<xsl:value-of select="$names" separator=", "/>
It's probably possible to use a trick xpath to get the same effect with a single value-of, but it's probably more maintainable to use the for-each form that you have in this case.
Even without being terribly tricky, one might refactor and extend as
<xsl:choose> <xsl:when test="position() = 1"> <xsl:text> </xsl:text> <xsl:otherwise> <xsl:when test="position()=last()"> <xsl:if test="position() > 2"> <xsl:text>,</xsl:text> </xsl:if> <xsl:text> and </xsl:text> </xsl:when> <xsl:otherwise> <xsl:text>, </xsl:text> </xsl:otherwise> </xsl:choose> <xsl:value-of select="."/>
As David says, moving the position()=1 test accounts for the case of a set with one member. Adding a test inside the position()=last() clause accounts for the case of two members, which presumably shouldn't get a comma between them.
The problem of transposing from singular to plural forms reliably in English requires either NLP or at least a lookup table with all your possible terms; it's usually best dealt with by writing around it.
E.g., not "router, tranformers, and chassis" but "routers (1), transformers (4), and chassis (3)". It's not elegant, but it's clear enough and not obviously wrong either.
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Help in extracting namesp, Enrico . Raymund | Thread | Re: [xsl] starts-with on more than , David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Directory listing, as xml, Michael Ludwig | Date | Re: [xsl] starts-with on more than , David Carlisle |
Month |