[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-compliance?
|
Subject: Re: [xsl] xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-compliance? From: Liam Quin <liam@xxxxxx> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:53:34 -0400 |
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 02:56:09PM +0200, Manfred Staudinger wrote: > > On 30/04/2008, Michael Ludwig <mlu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > I'd still be interested to know if (a) there is more to LibXSLT's > > > non-conformance > What I posted in a parallel thread > http://www.biglist.com/cgi-bin/wilma/wilma_hiliter/xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/200804/msg00515.html?line=8#hilite > may well turn out to be such a non-conformance. Please report it on the gnom xml list for libxml/libxslt, or using bugzilla, if it's a bug. I don't think that libxslt is particularly more or less strictly conformant to the spec than other implementations I've tried. I've yet to see a piece of software that's perfect; the questions to ask are, is it good enough to use, and if I report bugs, do they get fixed... Liam -- Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://www.fromoldbooks.org/
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-co, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] xsl version 1. one stylesheet, Mike_Bramley |
| [xsl] Checking for Cycles in a Grap, Darcy Parker | Date | |
| Month |
Keywords