[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

RE: [xsl] MSXML 6 and XSLT 2.0

Subject: RE: [xsl] MSXML 6 and XSLT 2.0
From: "Dan Acuff" <dacuff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:46:46 -0400

Ok thanks.  Work will not authorize a switch I allready know so I will
be doing this part of my project in XSLT 1.0

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 11:43 AM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [xsl] MSXML 6 and XSLT 2.0

> Quick question regarding this. Will XSLT 2.0 work with MSXML 6?

No. Currently available XSLT 2.0 processors are Saxon, Gestalt, and
AltovaXML.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] XSL-T should naturally loop? not grabbing all the children node-sets.., (continued) Abel Braaksma - 22 Apr 2008 16:27:02 -0000 Abel Braaksma - 22 Apr 2008 14:48:42 -0000 Dan Acuff - 22 Apr 2008 15:40:07 -0000 Michael Kay - 22 Apr 2008 15:43:47 -0000 Dan Acuff - 22 Apr 2008 15:47:10 -0000 <= Liam Quin - 22 Apr 2008 19:53:28 -0000 Martin Honnen - 22 Apr 2008 15:44:10 -0000 Andrew Welch - 22 Apr 2008 16:40:22 -0000 Wendell Piez - 22 Apr 2008 19:38:39 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] XSL-T should naturally loop? not grabbing all the children node-sets.., (continued)
- Abel Braaksma - 22 Apr 2008 14:48:42 -0000
  - Dan Acuff - 22 Apr 2008 15:40:07 -0000
    - Michael Kay - 22 Apr 2008 15:43:47 -0000
    - Dan Acuff - 22 Apr 2008 15:47:10 -0000 <=
    - Liam Quin - 22 Apr 2008 19:53:28 -0000
    - Martin Honnen - 22 Apr 2008 15:44:10 -0000
  - Andrew Welch - 22 Apr 2008 16:40:22 -0000
  - Wendell Piez - 22 Apr 2008 19:38:39 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] MSXML 6 and XSLT 2.0, Michael Kay	Thread	Re: [xsl] MSXML 6 and XSLT 2.0, Liam Quin
RE: [xsl] XSL-T should naturally lo, Michael Kay	Date	Re: [xsl] XSL-T should naturally lo, David Carlisle
	Month

Keywords

xslt

RE: [xsl] MSXML 6 and XSLT 2.0

Products

Features

Shop

Resources

Support

Company