[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
I agree. Although I'm pretty much wedded to Saxon-B I just hate to rely on what I'd consider to be a "beneficial side-effect" of Saxon processing...
On Apr 16, 2008, at 11:28 AM, Colin Adams wrote:
Re: [xsl] Suggestions for naming files based on starting node?
|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Suggestions for naming files based on starting node? From: Chris von See <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:35:07 -0700 |
I agree. Although I'm pretty much wedded to Saxon-B I just hate to rely on what I'd consider to be a "beneficial side-effect" of Saxon processing...
On Apr 16, 2008, at 11:28 AM, Colin Adams wrote:
On 16/04/2008, Chris von See <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Using generate-id() also works for points 1 and 3 above, and (using Saxon-B
9.0.0.4) it *appears* to generate ascending IDs, but I don't know if I can
depend on this as an ordering mechanism.
You certainly cant rely on such behaviour to be portable across processors, as the spec. doesn t mandate it.
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Suggestions for naming fi, Colin Adams | Thread | Re: [xsl] Suggestions for naming fi, David Carlisle |
| Re: [xsl] Suggestions for naming fi, Colin Adams | Date | [xsl] Research Openings at Telefón, Cesar Garcia-Osorio |
| Month |