[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
On 14/12/2007, at 11:31 PM, Andrew Welch wrote:
You can certainly unit test functions, as Mike Kay points out, but you can also unit test named templates; at least those that are essentially the equivalent of functions. Unit testing of these types of named templates is possible with either XSLT 1.0 or 2.0. An example of this is in the XSLT Standard Library, http://xsltsl.sf.net, see the 'test' subdirectory.
Re: [xsl] ANN: 'Testing XSLT' training course PDF available
|
Subject: Re: [xsl] ANN: 'Testing XSLT' training course PDF available From: Steve Ball <Steve.Ball@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 12:05:26 +1100 |
On 14/12/2007, at 11:31 PM, Andrew Welch wrote:
On 14/12/2007, Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:FYI, the PDF of my XML 2007 training course, 'Testing XSLT', is available at:
http://www.menteithconsulting.com/wiki/XML2007/TestingXSLT
You mention black box testing under the unit test heading... which doesn't quite fit.
Personally I don't think you can unit test XSLT*, it's only really worthwhile to test the output for a given set of inputs.
You can certainly unit test functions, as Mike Kay points out, but you can also unit test named templates; at least those that are essentially the equivalent of functions. Unit testing of these types of named templates is possible with either XSLT 1.0 or 2.0. An example of this is in the XSLT Standard Library, http://xsltsl.sf.net, see the 'test' subdirectory.
Regards, Steve Ball
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] ANN: 'Testing XSLT' train, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] ANN: 'Testing XSLT' train, Andrew Welch |
| Re: [xsl] String hashing code, Deborah Pickett | Date | [xsl] XML to EXCEL problem..., batis batuus |
| Month |