[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Getting variable yet most immediate parentNode
Subject: Re: [xsl] Getting variable yet most immediate parentNode
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:40:33 +0100
|
> But when this list of options gets longer, it might be better to add
> normal template matching and make the precedence explicit:
yes the main reason in xslt 1 for doing trick xpath predicates
like this is for use in xsl:sort where the restrictions of the language
mean that you have to pack all the code into a single xpath. there's no
point doing it in a value-of in real code.
David
________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs.
________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
- Re: [xsl] Getting variable yet most immediate parentNode, (continued)
- David Carlisle - Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:16:06 +0100
- Wendell Piez - Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:24:21 -0400
- Message not available
- David Carlisle - Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:02:06 +0100
- Abel Braaksma - Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:33:59 +0200
- David Carlisle - Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:40:33 +0100 <=
- David Carlisle - Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:15:09 +0100
- Message not available
- Abel Braaksma - Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:21:28 +0200
- Message not available
- Steve - Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:03:00 -0400
- Abel Braaksma - Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:40:23 +0200
|