[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 12:56:36 -0600, Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
I only have some old numbers for IE 6 (which I would need to locate), but you're right: We really should get some numbers that covers each browser in this regard.
Anyone happen to know of a good test-suite that could help in this matter?
M. David Peterson
http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 | http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155
Re: [xsl] Re: [HS] [xsl] XSL 2.0 and .NET and VB
Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: [HS] [xsl] XSL 2.0 and .NET and VB From: "M. David Peterson" <m.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 04:15:34 -0600 |
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 12:56:36 -0600, Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
I feel that should be so. Do you have any numbers? In particular in the context of this discussion (not about general SGML parsers but HTML vs. XHTML).
I only have some old numbers for IE 6 (which I would need to locate), but you're right: We really should get some numbers that covers each browser in this regard.
Anyone happen to know of a good test-suite that could help in this matter?
-- /M:D
M. David Peterson
http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 | http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSL 2.0 and .NET and VB, M. David Peterson | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: [HS] [xsl] XSL 2.0 an, M. David Peterson |
Re: [xsl] XSL 2.0 and .NET and VB, M. David Peterson | Date | Re: [xsl] XSL 2.0 and .NET and VB, M. David Peterson |
Month |