[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl]
Well, I for one (I'm a self-taught professional).
I always find it very surprising that programmers with experience only of imperative languages find taking up a declarative language difficult - after all we were all taught declarative semantics at school - in our mathmatics lessons.
But it is a very common experience - can anyone suggestion why this might be?
_________________________________________________________________
Txt a lot? Get Messenger FREE on your mobile. https://livemessenger.mobile.uk.msn.com/
Re: [xsl] XSL is NOT easy
Subject: Re: [xsl] <quote>XSL is NOT easy</quote> From: "Colin Adams" <colinpauladams@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 17:14:35 +0100 |
From: Nic James Ferrier <nferrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hey! I'm a self taught amateur too! (Actually, I'm not sure who isn't).
Well, I for one (I'm a self-taught professional).
I think XSLT is quite good for non-programmers, it's programmers with some experience of other things that find it really difficult I've found.
I always find it very surprising that programmers with experience only of imperative languages find taking up a declarative language difficult - after all we were all taught declarative semantics at school - in our mathmatics lessons.
But it is a very common experience - can anyone suggestion why this might be?
_________________________________________________________________
Txt a lot? Get Messenger FREE on your mobile. https://livemessenger.mobile.uk.msn.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] <quote>XSL is NOT easy</q, Robert Koberg | Thread | Re: [xsl] <quote>XSL is NOT easy</q, CyberSpace Industrie |
Re: [xsl] Context node is within a , Tristan Stevens | Date | RE: [xsl] document() can not used i, Houghton,Andrew |
Month |
Keywords