[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
J. S. Rawat wrote:
There is no processor available that can or will claim XSLT 1.1 conformance (there is not even a REC), so why would you bother developing on an abandoned spec?
-- Abel
Re: [xsl] Alternative of XSL:document in XSLT 2.0
|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Alternative of XSL:document in XSLT 2.0 From: Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 12:15:28 +0200 |
J. S. Rawat wrote:
In the 3rd edition 1.1 has been dropped almost completely from the written text. It is mentioned in the history section and in a very few instruction descriptions, only where confusion may rise. Like with the xsl:document instruction: " It should not be confused with the <xsl:document> instruction described in the abandoned XSLT 1.1 working draft....".
There is no version XSLT 1.1. There was an early working draft but it was
I have developed a xslt with verson 1.1. I have took the reference from MK's Book (XSLT 2nd edition) page 208 and its working fineYou are probably looking for xsl:result-document....and thanks david once again for the clue. Finally it is working
There is no processor available that can or will claim XSLT 1.1 conformance (there is not even a REC), so why would you bother developing on an abandoned spec?
-- Abel
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] Alternative of XSL:docume, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] REMOVE FROM MAILING LIST, JASON TREPANIER |
| Re: [xsl] Alternative of XSL:docume, J. S. Rawat | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT and XML in the same , M. David Peterson |
| Month |
Keywords