[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
On Sun, 27 May 2007 16:54:33 -0600, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That makes sense. Of course the document function requires an additional GET request which will obviously comes at a cost as well, though the data still has to get there somehow, so embedding it saves only the cost of the GET request itself. Still, it is a cost.
M. David Peterson
http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 | http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155
Re: [xsl] XSLT and XML in the same document
|
Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT and XML in the same document From: "M. David Peterson" <m.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 16:59:12 -0600 |
On Sun, 27 May 2007 16:54:33 -0600, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
if it implies a copy then there is an additional cost in using node set that would have to be balanced)
That makes sense. Of course the document function requires an additional GET request which will obviously comes at a cost as well, though the data still has to get there somehow, so embedding it saves only the cost of the GET request itself. Still, it is a cost.
-- /M:D
M. David Peterson
http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 | http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] XSLT and XML in the same , David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT and XML in the same , David Carlisle |
| Re: [xsl] XSLT and XML in the same , M. David Peterson | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT and XML in the same , David Carlisle |
| Month |