[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Alexander Johannesen wrote:
I peeked. It says: "The value must be a QName. If the QName does not have a prefix, then it identifies a method specified in this document and must be one of xml, html or text"
Meaning: it is an error if you specify something else than these three (unless in XSLT 2.0, where 'xhtml' was added).
Re: [xsl] PHP XSL adds Content-Type meta
Subject: Re: [xsl] PHP XSL adds Content-Type meta From: Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 13:18:13 +0200 |
Alexander Johannesen wrote:
On 5/8/07, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:if they make such an option available with name "xhtml" rather than use a name in their own extension namespace then they are not conformant.
If I do specify "xhtml", what should be the right behaviour for processors?
I peeked. It says: "The value must be a QName. If the QName does not have a prefix, then it identifies a method specified in this document and must be one of xml, html or text"
Meaning: it is an error if you specify something else than these three (unless in XSLT 2.0, where 'xhtml' was added).
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] PHP XSL adds Content-Type, Alexander Johannesen | Thread | RE: [xsl] PHP XSL adds Content-Type, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] PHP XSL adds Content-Type, Alexander Johannesen | Date | RE: [xsl] PHP XSL adds Content-Type, Michael Kay |
Month |