[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

RE: [xsl] Problem with Positional Grouping from MSXML

Subject: RE: [xsl] Problem with Positional Grouping from MSXML
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 14:54:16 -0000

>  From this line I understand that the XPath 2.0 "=" operator 
> allows to test an atomic value (like the string that the 
> attribute value is coerced into) against a sequence and 
> returns true if the atomic value equals any of the members of 
> the sequence.
> 
> If this is true, where I can find more information about this 
> feature and its prerequisites? I have searched the relevant 
> W3C specifications up and down, but in vain.

http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/#id-general-comparisons

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] Getting WordprocessingML p style, (continued) David Carlisle - Fri, 2 Feb 2007 23:10:33 GMT Yves Forkl - Mon, 05 Feb 2007 11:41:34 +0100 David Carlisle - Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:22:52 GMT Yves Forkl - Fri, 02 Feb 2007 14:10:22 +0100 Michael Kay - Fri, 2 Feb 2007 14:54:16 -0000 <= Florent Georges - Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:32:57 +0100 (CET) David Carlisle - Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:05:39 GMT Mukul Gandhi - Thu, 1 Feb 2007 21:30:28 +0530

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] Getting WordprocessingML p style, (continued)
- David Carlisle - Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:22:52 GMT
  - Yves Forkl - Fri, 02 Feb 2007 14:10:22 +0100
    - Michael Kay - Fri, 2 Feb 2007 14:54:16 -0000 <=
    - Florent Georges - Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:32:57 +0100 (CET)
    - David Carlisle - Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:05:39 GMT
- Mukul Gandhi - Thu, 1 Feb 2007 21:30:28 +0530

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Problem with Positional G, Yves Forkl	Thread	Re: [xsl] Problem with Positional G, Florent Georges
Re: [xsl] Saxon auto-recognition of, Abel Braaksma	Date	Re: [xsl] Problem with Positional G, Florent Georges
	Month

Keywords

xpath

RE: [xsl] Problem with Positional Grouping from MSXML

Products

Features

Shop

Resources

Support

Company