[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
David Carlisle wrote:
I personnally never used XQueryX, I understand this it's this: http://www.w3.org/TR/xqueryx/. Which is XML. Which means that we are talking nodes and not tags. Which means (imo) that XSLT can be the correct solution by manipulation a node tree that represents the XQueryX XML. Which also implies that there is absolutely no need for conditionally opening/closing a tag (meaning: just use nodes).
-- Abel Braaksma
Re: [xsl] Simple Question
|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Simple Question From: Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:31:50 +0100 |
David Carlisle wrote:
It's XQueryX the XML representation of XQuery (and thus also XPath).
I personnally never used XQueryX, I understand this it's this: http://www.w3.org/TR/xqueryx/. Which is XML. Which means that we are talking nodes and not tags. Which means (imo) that XSLT can be the correct solution by manipulation a node tree that represents the XQueryX XML. Which also implies that there is absolutely no need for conditionally opening/closing a tag (meaning: just use nodes).
-- Abel Braaksma
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Simple Question, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Simple Question, David Carlisle |
| Re: [xsl] ALWAYS assignment of XSL , David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] ALWAYS assignment of XSL , Michael Kay |
| Month |