[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
At 06:00 PM 10/13/2006, Dr KM wrote:
This is interesting ... it's true in XSLT 2.0, but not in XSLT 1.0, where one can select only nodes when executing a for-each.
In XSLT 1.0, indeed, the content of a for-each instruction is formally called a "template", while what we commonly call a "template" is actually named a "template rule" (which usage I see you observe :-). I suppose this is also not the case in XSLT 2.0?
OT: the English is correct; "applicable" is applicable. :-)
Re: [xsl] XSL and XML Help
|
Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL and XML Help From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:34:06 -0400 |
At 06:00 PM 10/13/2006, Dr KM wrote:
> You can do this with a for-each instruction, but anything you can do > with a for-each instruction you can do with templates
Excepted that template rules are applicable (mmh, not sure this is correct English) only to nodes.
This is interesting ... it's true in XSLT 2.0, but not in XSLT 1.0, where one can select only nodes when executing a for-each.
In XSLT 1.0, indeed, the content of a for-each instruction is formally called a "template", while what we commonly call a "template" is actually named a "template rule" (which usage I see you observe :-). I suppose this is also not the case in XSLT 2.0?
OT: the English is correct; "applicable" is applicable. :-)
Cheers, Wendell
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] XSL and XML Help, Florent Georges | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSL and XML Help, Florent Georges |
| Re: [xsl] Rename Some Node and attr, Davide Antoni | Date | [xsl] [XSLT 2.0] Checking that an e, Costello, Roger L. |
| Month |
Keywords