[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl]
Re: [xsl] vs
Subject: Re: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></empty?
From: drkm <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:40:50 +0100 (CET)
Eric Scheid wrote:
> On 12/12/05 2:44 AM, "drkm" wrote:
> > Browser? So you use 'xhtml' or 'html' serialization
> > method, don't you?
> yes.
> <xsl:output method="html" version="1.0"
> encoding="UTF-8" indent="yes"
> > See <URL:http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt-xquery-serialization/>.
> More exactly:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt-xquery-serialization/#xhtml-output
Not so far:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt-xquery-serialization/#html-output.
> So, it would seem the serialiser I'm using is defective,
> yes? Sadly, I don't think I have a choice in the matter,
> since I'm using the built in XSLT functionality of
> Filemaker.
I don't know Filemaker, but I never heard this name when speaking
about 2.0 (partial) implementations. So I guess it's 1.0 XSLT. So the
correct reference is:
http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xslt-19991116#section-HTML-Output-Method
The html output method should not output an end-tag
for empty elements. For HTML 4.0, the empty elements
are area, base, basefont, br, col, frame, hr, img,
input, isindex, link, meta and param. For example, an
element written as <br/> or <br></br> in the stylesheet
should be output as <br>.
Don't this tool permit you to change the XSLT processor to be used?
So you could use a correct implementation.
--drkm
___________________________________________________________________________
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger
Tilichargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
Current Thread
- Re: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></empty?, (continued)
- G. Ken Holman - Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:27:53 -0500
- Michael Kay - Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:36:23 -0000
- drkm - Sun, 11 Dec 2005 16:44:38 +0100 (CET)
- Eric Scheid - Mon, 12 Dec 2005 07:33:51 +1100
- drkm - Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:40:50 +0100 (CET) <=
- Michael Kay - Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:02:31 -0000
- Eric Scheid - Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:58:40 +1100
- drkm - Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:21:54 +0100 (CET)
- Eric Scheid - Mon, 12 Dec 2005 22:10:43 +1100
<- Previous Index Next ->
Re: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></emp, Eric Scheid
Thread
RE: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></emp, Michael Kay
RE: [xsl] xsl split string, Philippe LAPLANCHE
Date
RE: [xsl] xsl split string, Michael Kay
Month
Keywords
Subject: Re: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></empty? From: drkm <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:40:50 +0100 (CET) |
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></emp, Eric Scheid | Thread | RE: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></emp, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] xsl split string, Philippe LAPLANCHE | Date | RE: [xsl] xsl split string, Michael Kay |
Month |
Keywords