[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] second implementation of XSLT 2.0?
Subject: RE: [xsl] second implementation of XSLT 2.0? From: "DuCharme, Bob \(LNG-CHO\)" <bob.ducharme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 08:28:20 -0500 |
At 11/23/2005 07:29 AM, Elliotte Harold wrote: >>The W3C has never been the best organization for test suites and >>interoperability. For instance they do not require even one complete >>implementation before advancing to REC, only that each feature be >>independently implemented. It is possible for a W3C spec to be >>actively self-contradictory as long as different implementations >>implement different internally consistent subsets. Wednesday, November 23, 2005 12:16 PM, Jim Melton wrote: >So, your assertion has been disproven by providing a single contrary >example. Gratuitous criticisms are unwarranted, especially when >untrue. You might want to read the second paragraph of Elliotte's two-paragraph posting before quoting his first paragraph out of context and accusing him of making untrue, gratuitous criticism. Bob DuCharme
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] second implementation of , Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] Replacing strings, Sven Waibel |
[xsl] index grouping and sorting, Shailesh Shinde | Date | [xsl] node-set in .Net 2.0?, bryan rasmussen |
Month |