[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
At 11:17 AM 10/26/2005, I wrote:
Actually on rereading it occurs to me that XPath 2.0 doesn't depend on XSLT 2.0, but the latter does depend on the former (which has dependencies of its own). So the status of XPath 2.0 would potentially be the rub.
In any case, unless someone knowledgeable says otherwise, let's assume they're both moving along.
Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0 / XSLT 2.0 status and timing
Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0 / XSLT 2.0 status and timing From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:54:09 -0400 |
At 11:17 AM 10/26/2005, I wrote:
I'm actually interested in both the XPath 2.0 and XSLT 2.0 some-day-to-be-recs, and have more or less assumed that one can't be finalized before the other.
Actually on rereading it occurs to me that XPath 2.0 doesn't depend on XSLT 2.0, but the latter does depend on the former (which has dependencies of its own). So the status of XPath 2.0 would potentially be the rub.
In any case, unless someone knowledgeable says otherwise, let's assume they're both moving along.
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0 / XSLT 2.0 stat, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0 / XSLT 2.0 stat, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0 / XSLT 2.0 stat, Wendell Piez | Date | Re: [xsl] Help getting started with, Karl Stubsjoen |
Month |