[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Tempore 15:20:04, die 09/21/2005 AD, hinc in xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx scripsit David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>:
The result of the transformation is:
This is not even well-formed XML anymore. How can you still call it an identity transformation, when it gives this behaviour?
Re: [xsl] Strict sequential identity rule?
Subject: Re: [xsl] Strict sequential identity rule? From: "Joris Gillis" <roac@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:36:08 +0200 |
Tempore 15:20:04, die 09/21/2005 AD, hinc in xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx scripsit David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>:
I'd say FALSE, because it cannot handle this XML document properly:
it can so:-)
The result of the transformation is:
<!-- foo --> <bar>baz</bar> <bar>baz</bar>
This is not even well-formed XML anymore. How can you still call it an identity transformation, when it gives this behaviour?
regards, -- Joris Gillis (http://users.telenet.be/root-jg/me.html) Don't send spam. I don't like it and it is illegal.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Strict sequential identit, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Strict sequential identit, George Cristian Bina |
Re: [xsl] Strict sequential identit, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Strict sequential identit, George Cristian Bina |
Month |
Keywords