[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] xpath selection problem
Subject: RE: [xsl] xpath selection problem From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 17:09:24 +0100 |
In 2.0 you can do following-sibling::node[@hidden='0'] except following-sibling::node[@hidden='1']/(.|following-sibling::node()) Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Gabriel [mailto:gabriel.klappenbach@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 18 September 2005 16:17 > To: XSL-list > Subject: [xsl] xpath selection problem > > Hi. > > On a document axis I have a list of nodes like this: > > <node hidden=0>a</node> > <node hidden=1>b</node> > <node hidden=1>c</node> > <node hidden=0>d</node> > <node hidden=0>e</node> > <node hidden=0>f</node> > <node hidden=1>g</node> > <node hidden=1>h</node> > <node hidden=1>j</node> > <node hidden=0>k</node> > > > I want to select the group of consecutive nodes that have > hidden=1 after the > context node, that will have hidden=0. So the context node > will iterate over > the list of nodes that have hidden=0. > > So if I were to output the contents of the selections, I > would first get > "bc" and then "ghj" > > > How can I express this in xpath without using recursion? Is > it possible > doing this without calling a template that uses recursion? > That is, I would > like to have an expression, something like > following-sibling::*[@hidden=1], but with the addition that > it excludes the > nodes in the other groups... > > /Gabriel
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] xpath selection problem, Gabriel | Thread | [xsl] can't get xsl:sort to work, UlyLee |
Re: [xsl] xpath selection problem, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] xpath selection problem, Gabriel |
Month |
Keywords