[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
At 04:43 PM 8/24/2005, Dimitre wrote:
...
Yes: for FXSL it is an obvious gain. So that's one scenario for which we have some kind of authoritative finding. :->
Re: [xsl] 1.0 and 2.0 and suitability for tasks
Subject: Re: [xsl] 1.0 and 2.0 and suitability for tasks From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:35:00 -0400 |
At 04:43 PM 8/24/2005, Dimitre wrote:
> So I think the best thing we XSLTers can do for now is try 2.0 and assess
> it on our own, not paying too too much attention to the marketers either way.
...
Tried.
Assessed.
Remarkable results produced...
Just try to compare FXSL for XSLT 2.0 with FXSL for XSLT 1.0.
Yes: for FXSL it is an obvious gain. So that's one scenario for which we have some kind of authoritative finding. :->
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] 1.0 and 2.0 and suitabili, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] 1.0 and 2.0 and suitabili, Manfred Staudinger |
Re: [xsl] How to get UTC displayed , Wendell Piez | Date | Re: [xsl] 1.0 and 2.0 and suitabili, Manfred Staudinger |
Month |