[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] getting java file parameters and tunnelling
Subject: RE: [xsl] getting java file parameters and tunnelling From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 21:51:42 +0100 |
The only way to pass information between two stylesheets in a pipeline - including a pipeline implemented using saxon:next-in-chain - is to put the information in the XML document that's the output of the first stylesheet and the input of the second. Tunnel parameters are for template calls within a stylesheet, they have nothing to do with chaining or pipelines. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Rahil [mailto:qamar_rahil@xxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 09 August 2005 15:38 > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xsl] getting java file parameters and tunnelling > > Hi Andrew > > andrew welch wrote: > > >On 8/9/05, Rahil <qamar_rahil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > >>I have resolved my first query but am still stuck with the > tunneling of > >>the parameter, which is query (2) below. > >> > >>Could someone please help. All I want to do is to pass two > file names > >>from file1.xsl to file2.xsl. > >> > >> > > > >A global parameter in either stylesheet with exist in both - > >stylesheet parameters don't use the tunnel attribute. When the > >stylesheets are combined either through import or include the global > >parameters will be available to both stylesheets. > > > > > But is the same true if you are using the 'next-in-chain' attribute ? > > In that case can I assume that I can safely use $TestFileNm which has > obtained its value in first.xsl ? > > Thanks > Rahil
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] getting java file paramet, Rahil | Thread | RE: [xsl] getting java file paramet, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] xsl:number on attribute n, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] n squared matching proble, David Carlisle |
Month |
Keywords