[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] Instantiating anyAtomicType -- why would I?
Subject: RE: [xsl] Instantiating anyAtomicType -- why would I? From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 08:28:10 +0100 |
> > xdt:anyAtomicType is in fact an abstract type, and this > cast should perhaps > > fail. > > If it is abstract, why should it /perhaps/ fail? Shouldn't it > then always fail? > > Also, where is it normatively asserted that the type is > abstract? I can't find > it here, for example: > http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-datamodel/#types-predefined > I've raised these points on the public comments list. (The public comments period has closed, but we're meeting later this month and there should be a chance to tackle issues raised up to that date.) Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Instantiating anyAtomicTy, Frans Englich | Thread | FW: [xsl]Add comment from xml sourc, Meinel, Lois |
Re: [xsl] Instantiating anyAtomicTy, Frans Englich | Date | RE: [xsl] Concatenating the attribu, Michael Kay |
Month |