[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] Saxon for windows?
Subject: RE: [xsl] Saxon for windows? From: Pieter Reint Siegers Kort <pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 10:18:56 -0500 |
Hi Kevin, Windows does allow for command pipelining - the symbol "|" is used to chain commands. Since my processes run in a command line process, I can chain processes if needed. No need to save to a file. The only requirement is that the program that runs supports input/output file redirection. Cheers, Pieter -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Rodgers [mailto:kevin.rodgers@xxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 9:48 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] Saxon for windows? M. David Peterson writes: > - Capturing the commandline output, again, is really quite simple. > But what next? The only way to chain together a transformation would > be a to first save the transformation to a file, run another > commandline transformaton with that saved file, and so on and so > forth. Again, a performance bottleneck. ... > Any other questions? Is there really no way to pipeline processes on Windows, like with a pipe on Unix? -- Kevin Rodgers
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Saxon for windows?, M. David Peterson | Thread | RE: [xsl] Saxon for windows?, Pieter Reint Siegers |
RE: [xsl] Dynamically controlling s, Maria Amuchastegui | Date | Re: [xsl] Saxon for windows?, M. David Peterson |
Month |