[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re: [xsl] Time for an exslt for 2.0?)
|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re: [xsl] Time for an exslt for 2.0?) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 09:57:12 +0100 |
> Or are you requesting banning non-pure functions altogether? > This would mean disallowing calls to extension functions, By extension function here you'd have to include banning functions that can be defined within xslt (or xquery) not just vendor-extensions. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Better include them in th, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | Re: [xsl] Better include them in th, Dimitre Novatchev |
| Re: [xsl] Better include them in th, Colin Paul Adams | Date | Re: [xsl] Better include them in th, Dimitre Novatchev |
| Month |
Keywords