[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re: [xsl] Time for an exslt for 2.0?)
|
Subject: RE: [xsl] Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re: [xsl] Time for an exslt for 2.0?) From: Kevin Rodgers <kevin.rodgers@xxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 18:08:58 -0600 |
Michael Kay writes: > It's not really any worse than the fact that (in XQuery notation) (<a/> is > <a/>) return false. In fact, the problem is even there in XSLT 1.0. Uh oh, hot dog! -- Kevin Rodgers
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] Better include them in th, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Better include them in th, Colin Paul Adams |
| [xsl] Using <xsl:for-each> and posi, David Gadd | Date | RE: [xsl] Using <xsl:for-each> and , Aron Bock |
| Month |